Opinion at SpelledSideways

Islam has spawned many sects that are master practitioners of the art of double standards. As far as Muslims are concerned, what is good for Muslims is not good for the non-Muslims; and what is bad for Muslims is good for non-Muslims.

What complicates matters is that there is no way of knowing which of the dozens of at-each-other's-throat sects is the legitimate Islam. As soon as Muhammad died, his religion of peace became a house of internal war: jockeying for power and leadership started, sects formed and splintered into sub-sects, and bloodletting began in earnest.

The internal infighting in Islam is presently playing in full color - in red - most dramatically, in the Iraqi theater. Shiite raid Sunni civilians, slaughter them like sheep, and toss their bodies like trash in the streets or the rivers. The Sunnis return the favor with just as much viciousness and savagery.

Question: If this is the way these Muslims treat each other, how would they deal with the infidels if they had the chance?

Answer: These devoted followers of Muhammad would deal with the infidels exactly the way Muhammad did: behead the non-believers, take them as slaves to hold or sell, or make them pay back-breaking jizya - poll taxes.

Some may object that writings like this are little more than hate-mongering and fanning the fire that rages between Islam and the non-Islamic world. They may further play the Islamic apologists' few, well-worn propaganda cards as evidence for their contention that Islam is not what its detractors claim.

Here are the few favorite cards:

* "There is no compulsion in religion," says the Quran. (But the full context is never shown.)

* Islam means "peace," so Islam is a religion of peace.

* "For you, your religion, and for me, my religion," Muhammad reportedly said.

The Muslims and their apologists quickly run out of their few cards, and the rest of the Islamic deck is all about intolerance, hatred and violence toward the infidels, toward all others who are not true Muslims, and even toward those who consider themselves Muslims. Shiites, for instance, judge the Sunnis as traitors to Islam, and Sunnis condemn the Shiites as heretics. Each side deems the other worthy of death and hellfire.

This internecine Islamic war of the religion of peace is not confined to the Shiite-Sunni divide. There are so many internal divisions within each side that listing and describing them comprehensively would be an encyclopedic work.

So, who is right? What are the facts about Islam and how does Islam impact the ever-shrinking village Earth and its inhabitants? Admittedly, this is a huge question and cannot be answered satisfactorily in one article. However, some facts can be presented to help the reader decide.

There is no need to belabor the point that Islam is not, and has never been, a religion of peace. The word Islam is derived from taslim, which purely means "submission," while the term for "peace" is solh. Another derivation of the word taslim is ?salema?, which means "good health" and so on.

Irrespective of what the term Islam may mean, the facts on the ground conclusively demonstrate Islam's violent nature from its very inception. No need to go back to the time of Muhammad and examine the historical records. Just a few contemporary events should make the point.

Here is a partial list: the savage Shiite-Sunni bloodletting in Iraq; the barbarism of the resurgent Taliban in Afghanistan; the genocide in Sudan's Darfur region; the Somali killings; the Iranian mullahs' murder of their own people and support of mischief abroad; the incessant terrorist acts of Hamas, Hizbollah and Islamic Jihad on Israel, and numerous fatwas on infidels and apostates; the bombing of Shiite mosques in Pakistan and Iraq and the Shiite retaliation against soft, innocent and civilian targets.

Clearly, there is no place on the planet where Muslims reside that is in peace from the religion of peace. America, Spain, France, Netherlands, England, Thailand, India and Indonesia have already been attacked, while others, such as Denmark, have been threatened and sanctioned.

Stretching the benefit of the doubt beyond limits, one may believe that all these acts of horrors are committed by a small minority of thugs and radicals who happened to be Muslims. Fine, let us ignore all those "fringes" for now - those who are giving Islam a bad reputation. And never mind Saudi Arabia, the cradle of barbarism, fixed in formaldehyde since Islam's inception. Also, let us overlook the dastardly Shiite fanatics presently ruling (ruining) the great nation of Iran. Iranian Shiite Hitlerists are hell-bent on wiping Israel off the face of the planet, while viciously devastating Iran's own largest minority - the Baha'is, people universally-recognized as law-abiding and peaceful.

Would someone account for what is happening in the "civilized" Islamic country of Egypt? The world owes Egypt a debt of gratitude for giving it the Muslim Brotherhood - the lead promoter of Sunni hatred toward the infidels, with chapters and front organizations in much of the world. With typical hypocrisy, the Egyptian government claims that the Muslim Brotherhood is outlawed, when, in actuality, the Brotherhood holds twenty-five percent of the seats in the Egyptian parliament. The same country that gave the world vicious American-killers like Al-Zawahiri is the recipient of huge largess from the American taxpayer.

Islamic rules are called Sharia law or the Islamic law. Sharia law is a misnomer, for laws must be squarely based on justice and fairness to all, while Sharia law is nothing more than a primitive set of dogma stipulated by men for the benefit of Muslim men.

Sharia law disenfranchises women from their legitimate equal rights with men; prescribes barbaric punishments such as stoning, amputation of limbs and death. Sharia law, contrary to what its advocates claim, does not limit application of its draconian provisions to Muslims only: it considers any and all disputes involving Muslims with non-Muslims also in its purview to adjudicate. Sharia law is inherently arbitrary, obsolete, and discriminatory to the extreme. Wherever Sharia law rules, injustice prevails. Non-Muslims, women, and even children are victimized by its biased and cruel provisions.

Sharia law represents a twist to the concept of Blind Justice: It is indeed blind to justice. Even a cursory examination of Sharia?s family law, for instance, proves unequivocally its blindness to justice: it makes the shameful past laws, such as Jim Crow laws, seem as paragons of fairness by comparison.

These are the conditions on the ground wherever Sharia rules. Violence of all forms is endemic to Islamic law and is not confined to any fringes. Sharia law itself is the fringe--a fringe that is oppressive, hateful of others and violent to the core. Presently, fanatical Islam is lashing out with mad fury before its own final demise. The ?infidel? world has been complicit in the surge of Islamism through its mistakes, complacency, and greed.

Warning: Islam is not a religion but a political ideology which incites hate, violence, intolerance and terror. Islamists are terminators. You cannot bargain with them. You cannot reason with them. They do not feel pity or remorse, or fear. And they absolutely will not stop, ever, until all the infidels are dead or have submitted to Islam. The only language the Islamists understand is the language of force.

In non-Muslim lands, Islamism, flush with Petrodollars, has been accelerating in its drive for the world Caliphate and is moving at the speed of light by building more mosques, printing more indoctrinating Islamic books, imposing more of its presence in the western culture, in our schools and university campuses, bullying, intimidating and challenging more Christians and other peaceful people of faith and by using our democratic laws against us.

In the Islamdom, they can dish out insults to non-Muslims; arrest Christians, Bahia?s or the Jews just for praying. They can confiscate their Holy books and toss them in the trash. They call the Jews pigs and monkeys, and spit on anyone that isn?t Muslim. But they go into frenzies of righteous outrage at the slightest criticism of their barbaric and highly dangerous beliefs.

They never need to challenge the existing political order in our country, but can achieve all their goals without bothering or violating the Constitution of the U.S. because that Constitution guarantees complete government non-interference toward religion. Finally and the most important element perhaps is the extreme coziness and appeasement by the current U.S. administration towards Islam, Muslims and radical Muslims which will recklessly and unknowingly drag the whole country and her citizens into an everlasting Islamic inferno, an inferno similar to the Islamic Republic of Iran and other Islamic terrorist countries.

A constitutional amendment must be passed quickly defining Islam as a hostile political force with a global totalitarian agenda, and as such is totally inimical to our constitution and our national security, and that further to this definition, all practicing Muslims must either renounce this cult or be deported to their countries of origin, and all mosques must be demolished, since their goal is to propagate political propaganda, which has nothing whatsoever to do with 'religion' - let alone one of ?peace?. That?s going to be the final ?solution? for Islam in America.

?Fight and kill the disbelievers wherever you find them, take them captive, harass them, lie in wait and ambush them using every stratagem of war.? Qur?an:9:5

"Fight those who do not believe until they all surrender, paying the protective tax in submission." Qur'an:9:29

We must also end the deadly practice of ?Political Correctness.? Truth, only naked truth, can set us free. And freedom is our greatest gift of life. Life without freedom is death disguised as life. Remember Patrick Henry?s cry: Give me liberty or give me death. Humanity cannot afford, and must not ignore, the emergence of the latest threat to its very existence on this planet. We must fight for life, for liberty, for freedom and end the nightmare of Islamic hellfire.

Church & State - Separate & Unequal??

Should people who are Christians be involved in politics? I have received email from people who believe that politics and religion should never be mixed. A common statement that is retorted endlessly is "Separation of Church and State".

I agree that separation of church and state is a very wise thing. Our founding fathers specifically spelled out in the First Amendment that "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof". So indeed, it is self evident that the government has no role in creating a "state church" or in being a theocracy.

Here is an assumed and misplaced thought, that there is an automatic separation of of Religious Faith and state. If you look at the First Amendment again, you will see that it is quite specific in its definition...it restricts the government, not religion. Nowhere do you find restriction on the ability of churches or preachers from criticizing the government on the basis of Christian morality. Society can take it or leave it, but they certainly do not have the legal right to shut it up.

We live in an era where the voice of faith is diminished, ridiculed, attacked and told it has no place in the marketplace of ideas, either in education or government. Why should the influence of governmental policy only be guided by the godless? Our founding fathers would be aghast!

There is no evidence to imply that the founding fathers ever intended to deny the "voice of faith" influence in the public square of ideas. To think differently would show one's ignorance of history and a mountain of written evidence contrary to that conclusion. The Constitution is clear, that the "separation of church and state" had the intent of only being a one way street...to keep government out of the business and practice of churches.

Our heritage is replete with examples of faith and government. Whether it has been the practice of opening prayers from the very beginning of our nation to the present of both the Senate and Congress, the depiction of the Ten Commandments on buildings in Washington, DC, or in more recent times , long public prayers by Franklin Roosevelt on D-Day , or Dwight Eisenhower at the beginning of his inauguration speech in 1952.

How have we come to be a nation without a moral compass?...it is because too many preachers and too many people of faith now fear to exercise their Constitutional right to be a part of the public marketplace of ideas. Political correctness has attempted to banish our heritage of faith to the closet. When freedom of religion and its ability to be heard is oppressed and diminished, realize that tyranny is never very far behind.

Are Liberals Mentally Ill?

Dr. Lyle Rossiter, a veteran psychiatrist, wrote a book explaining the ideology motivating leftists/liberals/progressives is—in fact—a mental disorder. His work, The Liberal Mind: The Psychological Causes of Political Madness explains the diagnosis.

Rossiter writes, "Based on strikingly irrational beliefs and emotions, modern liberals relentlessly undermine the most important principles on which our freedoms were founded." He also adds, “Like spoiled, angry children, they rebel against the normal responsibilities of adulthood and demand that a parental government meet their needs from cradle to grave."

Though somewhat generalised, Dr. Rossiter has a valid point. Leftist thinking is oft reduced to a cacophonous calliope of irrationality devoid of the jacket and tie of facts. For the Leftist, up is down, in is out, immorality is good, and God is evil. This mindset stems from a skewed view of life and an abiding hatred for authority—unless, of course, the inmates take over the asylum. Then, and only then, must authority be obeyed.

To quote from the movie Dream Team, a Leftist is like “an escaped mental patient with a low frustration tolerance." He demands life to be “fair” and “equal”. Not unlike their days at recess when many of them protested to an authority figure (teacher), demanding she equalise outcomes because they’d lost all their marbles in a schoolyard match due to their lack of mibs shooting skills.

Despite concrete evidence that raising tax rates reduce revenues by robbing the productive of the incentive to produce above and beyond the norm, leftists/liberals/progressives insist we try again in the interest of fairness. Let’s do the same thing over and over, each time expecting a different result.

The victims of this mental affliction may be found in all walks of life, including religion. However, the term Liberal Christian is always an oxymoron. Two competing belief systems cannot be melded together. One is without reason, hence oft irrational to the point of psychosis, while Christianity is not. A “liberal” Christian is simply a liberal who has co-opted the language of Christianity for the purposes of deception.

To a leftist/liberal/progressive—like a mental patient convinced of his own sanity—it is the grownups in society that are mentally deficient. The Leftist claims a unique insight to deeper truths, an insight we grownups and caretakers lack. To the Leftist, he makes perfect sense and cannot understand why grownups rarely take his advice. Most likely another grassy-knoll conspiracy; or something.

We grownups should always keep in mind that in an insane society, the sane man must appear insane.

Liberals may be the tares in the wheat field, and while I don’t advocate rooting them out, we need to remember we don’t put children behind the wheels of vehicles. If Hannibal Lecter is last person on earth we’d want to smoke a joint with, why in God’s name would a sane man put a liberal in charge of our society?

Restoring The Dollar

With all the problems that are facing the economy today, it is amazing that within my short lifetime that the United States was once considered the vanguard of global financial strength. Now, our dollar is being considered to be replaced as the world's reserve currency.

A lot of that credit can be traced to the backing of our currency by hard assets, such as gold and silver. The Constitution itself addresses this issue in Section 8 of Article 1 by stating that only Congress would have the authorization to coin money, and NOT a consortium of independent banks, which is in reality what the Federal Reserve is.

Look carefully at the bills in your wallet. They are called "Federal Reserve Notes". They do not imply any backing by either gold or silver. Up until 1964, dollar and other denominational notes carried the slogan "Silver Certificates" with the added verbiage of "In silver, payable upon demand". Thus true wealth, whether it was gold or silver was backing our currency.

What was the fruit of such an asset based system? Indeed they were myriad. As late as 1969 we had a balanced Federal budget. We were a net lender to the world, and not a hopelessly dependent debtor nation to a Communist country like China. We dominated the world economically, and were a net exporter of goods, and not just the consumer nation we have devolved into today.

Even things like our lunch money as school children reflected this strength. I remember vividly receiving my lunch money in the early 1960's for elementary school. These coins were composed of real silver for the dimes, quarters and half dollars. Nickels were made out of real nickel, and pennies were made out of real copper, not the cheap zinc imitations of today. Again I marvel at how far we have slipped as a people. Our pride as a nation has been broken.

Under a hard asset monetary system, inflation remained in check. In fact, there was very little if any inflation for the entire time period from 1800 to 1913 under a hard asset system. Even after the establishment of the Federal Reserve in 1913, because of at least a partial tether of gold and silver reserve status, inflation remained under 2% annually for 50 years. Remember that inflation is a secret tax that slowly robs your money of its purchasing power. Since the 1970s, when the restraint of asset back currency was abandoned, your purchasing power has declined nearly 4.5% a year on average. Additionally, this has allowed government to indebt us with trillions of dollars of future liabilities because they were freed of the restraints of sound Constitutionally mandated money.

When elected to Congress, I pledge full efforts to restore our monetary system to sound practices and Constitutional asset based standards.

Does Islam Breed Violence?

Truth be told, violence is the animating force of Islam. Islam is a religion born through violence, raised by violence, which thrives on violence, and which dies without violence.

Top

That's So Gay

by Henry Makow

"We must now face the harsh truth that the objectives of communism are being steadily advanced because many of us do not recognize the means used to advance them. ... The individual is handicapped by coming face to face with a Conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists. The American mind simply has not come to a realization of the evil which has been introduced into our midst." J. Edgar Hoover (Elks Magazine, August 1956.)

Millions of young people say, "That's so gay" to denote alien, different or unhealthy.

To me, this is a hopeful sign that civilization may yet survive.

For Rockefeller-Rothschild social engineers, however, it's a nightmare.

These youths did not imbibe the propaganda that gay and straight are the same, i.e. "lifestyle preferences" like cable or satellite.

So these Cabalist bankers have launched an expensive "public service" TV campaign to teach kids that obeying their healthy instincts is "homophobic."

They've got celebrities like lesbian comedian Wanda Sykes and Hillary Duff overhearing teenagers, interrupting and chewing them out. "How would you like it if your identity was used to mean dumb or stupid?"

ANTHROPOLOGY

Every first-year anthropology student learns that group cohesion is maintained by defining in-group and out-group behavior. If a group cannot define itself in these terms, it disappears. (For example, homosexuals use the derogatory term "breeders" to refer to us.)

You're not homophobic. This campaign is a rearguard action in a war on your sexual identity. Gay Pride apparently is OK but heterosexuals cannot uphold their identity. I'm here to tell you, "Bend over no more."

Until 1975, homosexuality was considered a developmental disorder. Therapists thought it a major neurosis, a sexual perversion and even a physical illness. Then the Rockefellers yanked the American Psychological Association's chain and magically, overnight, what for centuries had been abnormal, suddenly was normal.

This is part of a larger attack on gender and marriage designed to decrease population and undermine the family. In the bankers' New World Order, children are born to single mothers or in laboratories and raised by the state to serve the bankers.

Do you really think the Rockefellers, who financed Eugenics for a century, including Mengele's heinous experiments in Auschwitz, care about homosexuals' feelings? No, they are trying to turn you into homosexuals. They want you to suffer from this disorder. That's why you are learning in school that homosexuality is normal .That's why they use psychological war (guilt) to level your heterosexual defenses.

This isn't about equality and human rights. It's about social engineering and mind control. It's about depopulation and dictatorship.

GAYS MORE EQUAL

In 2002, a Mormon girl was ribbed by her new classmates. "Do you have ten moms?" To which she replied, "That's so gay."

Those three words landed her in big trouble. So how selective is this? A Christian's feelings can be hurt, but not a gay person's? Why is that?

They are not promoting tolerance. They are not promoting Christianity. They are promoting homosexuality.

The organization behind the ads, GLSEN, the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network, has 40 full-time employees! They sponsor pro- gay propaganda in thousands of schools under the pretense that gay youths are being persecuted. The Rockefeller Foundation is paying.

Wake up heterosexuals! Wars of aggression always use a phony pretext of defending someone from attack.

In reality, heterosexuality is under attack. You are being persecuted. You are coerced to adopt unhealthy behavior which will prevent you from marrying and procreating.

For course, gay youths should be treated with kindness and consideration. It's not their fault they are gay. They're not aware of how homosexuality being used. But let's draw a line. They're not the same as we are and we have a right to say so.

A LITTLE BACKGROUND

Our society has been subverted by Cabalist bankers, including many homosexuals, who have stolen the governments' credit card. Now have to create a dictatorship to protect their prize.

They are behind all wars, depression, 9-11 and the credit crunch. These are ways to degrade and demoralize humanity so we will accept their tyranny.

Instead of thinking of homosexuality as same-sex attraction, think of it as gender role confusion resulting in "failure to permanently bond with (i.e. marry) a member of the opposite sex." This failure results in arrested development. Homosexuals generally compensate by having promiscuous sex.

Can you see how, in these terms, heterosexuals have become like homosexuals? Courtship is almost dead. Anonymous sex ("hooking up") is in. The marriage and birth rates are down 33% to 50% from 50 years ago. Forty per cent of children are born out of wedlock.

Heterosexuality is not a "lifestyle preference." Heterosexuality is being part of the natural life cycle essential to personal development, happiness and the survival of the species. A country that cared about its survival would foster courtship, marriage and family. Children need the security, love and example of heterosexual parents in a strong marriage.

A country that has been subverted by an alien occult financial power perverts its young men and women. Our politicians, media and educators serve this alien financial power.

Here is what a nurse says about perversions and diseases liniked to the "gay lifestyle."

The bankers foster the illusion that gays are just like us, interested in marriage. They aren't. In Holland and Sweden where gays are allowed to have civil unions, less than 3% do. The same is true of Canada. The bankers want you to behave like most gays. They want you to have sex but not marriage and family. They own the world and see you as cattle or "useless eaters."

CONCLUSION

So on Father's Day, let's celebrate heterosexuality. Let's celebrate marriage and children.
Let's celebrate men who support and lead their families, and women who sacrifice for husband and children.

As for the Rockefellers' commercials, let's say, "That's so gay!"

"Published originally at EtherZone.com Publication allowed with this notice and hyperlink intact."

Top

Liberty vs. Demagogues

by Amil Imani

What is a demagogue? According to the encyclopedia, a demagogue is a politician skilled in oratory, flattery, and invective, evasive in discussing vital issues, promising everything to everybody, appealing to the passions rather than the reason of the public, and arousing racial, religious, and class prejudices.

History tells us that personal liberty is most often the demagogue's first victim, particularly when popular sentiment is whipped up against some internal or foreign enemy. In other words, liberty and demagogos cannot coexist. The ancient Greek word "demagogos" means simply a spokesman for the people or, more pejoratively, a leader of the mob. “Modern usage implies rhetorical gifts and the ability to arouse an audience, usually with the promise of radical change.”

We have been warned of three kinds of people: charlatans, demagogues, and politicians. And, more often than not, someone will rise up who is all three of these characters wrapped into one. Our liberty is the most precious possession. Many will aim to rob us of it and, by so doing, add to their own power, while trying to force us to become robots. We need to be vigilant and guard our liberty with our very lives.

Desperate situations spawn desperate measures. Not having learned the lessons of history, many people will turn to charlatans, demagogues, and politicians with dire consequences. Just a few old and recent cases of this tragic misstep should warn us not to be victimized in the future by frauds.

From the primitive land of the Arabian Peninsula of over 14 centuries ago rose Muhammad, an illiterate hired hand of a rich widow Khadija, claiming that he was the bearer of a perfect life prescription from God—the Quran. He claimed humanity could do no better than to follow its precepts as well as to emulate Muhammad’s own life example for a guarantee of bliss and salvation. In exchange for this, people must embrace Islam—surrender—by surrendering their Liberty to Muhammad.

Question: Why would the All-Wise Lord choose an illiterate desert-dweller, of all the people in the world, to be his messenger? Why choose a man who couldn’t read or write, a man who, over the course of 20 years, claimed to be receiving periodic revelations from God and had to rely on others who could write to jot down his recollections? These recollections were recorded as the word-for-word literal utterances and commandments of God. Furthermore, a dozen versions of the book of Allah, the Quran, turned up and a fallible Caliph selected one of them and had the rest burned. Burning books has ever since been a companion to Islam’s mission.

To this day, in places where Islam rules, many books are banned, newspapers and magazines are systematically either censored or shut down, and other non-print media are methodically blocked. Then liberty, deeply cherished by democracies, is replaced by submission—unquestioning obedience and adherence to the dictates and precepts of the all-knowing and all-wise Allah.

In no time at all, the savages of Arabia, allured by the win-win promise of Muhammad—you kill you get the booty from your victims in this world—you get killed and your abode will be the unimaginably glorious sensuous paradise of Allah—sword-in-hand, sallied forth to lands near and far.

From the “civilized” land of Germany rose a syphilitic lout who called on the German people to surrender their liberty to him in exchange for a surefire solution to all their economic and social ills. He successfully portrayed the Jews as the main cause of the nation’s suffering. Before long, the masses of gullible easy-solution seekers formed long lines in towns and villages of the land, tripping over each other in eagerness to surrender their liberty to the savior Fuhrer.

The German people blindly subscribed to the Nazi’s promises of economic revival, restoration of German pride, and the establishment of supremacy for the Aryan race. In a blink, hordes of rabid Brown Shirts fanned the length and the breadth of the land hunting the Jews. The fire of anti-Jew mania quickly expanded to devour Gypsies, non-Christians in general, the physically or mentally handicapped, the homosexuals and more.

The genocidal Hitler found it expedient to overlook some of the “despicable” Semitic people—the Arabs—by affording the Grand Mufti of Palestine, Haj Amin al-Husseini, a fellow Jew-hater, a most effusive welcome to Germany. To fool a majority of the people for a considerable period might be fatal. Hitler needed only a few years to ruin Germany.

There is hardly a need to document the horrors of the Nazi episode here, where a charlatan managed to hoodwink a nation, rob the people of their liberty and cause so much death and destruction.

It is unthinkable that an ancient nation—Iran—with a distinguished history, allowed a high order demagogue, Ayatollah Khomeini, to rally the people against the Shah with promises of rule for the people and justice for all. The long-suffering Iranians of all strata readily surrendered their liberty to the turbaned bigot and his gang of murdering sycophants.

In Iran, wishful thinking people saw the “holy man of Allah” as an answer to prayer. The fanatic Muslims perceived him as the one who would revive the flagging fortunes of the faith of Muhammad and pave the way for the much-anticipated advent of the Saheb-ul-Zaman (the Lord of the Age.) The secularists hoped for freedom from the Shah’s dictatorship. Religious and ethnic minorities dreamed of a time when unscrupulous power brokers would no longer victimize them.

Gullibility was not limited to the Iranians who swelled the ranks of the fraud. On the other side of the world, the President of the United States of America—the Lusting in the heart Carter—saw Khomeini as a saint and a savior. Carter provided the crucial support to the man whose greatest claim to the rank of the Grand Ayatollah was his lengthy dissertation on matters concerning sexual intercourse with animals.

No sooner had this fraud of Allah ascended to power than the Iranians of all strata began to pay the price - tens of thousands with their lives - for the folly of letting the three-in-one Ayatollah make decisions for them, the three-in-one that we had been warned about.

For over thirty years the Iranian people have been paying for the tragedy that has befallen them. And that’s not where it ends. Khomeinism is the fire that is spreading beyond the borders of Iran. Khomeinism is a recent violent version of Islam’s Shiism. Islam means surrender. Surrender to the will and dictates of Allah as revealed by Mohammad.

A true Muslim does not and cannot believe in liberty. Everything is up to Allah, so says Mohammad. Everything that a Muslim does is contingent upon the will and decree of Allah. It is for this reason that the phrase Ensha-Allah (Allah willing) always accompanies any promise or commitment that a believer makes. By embracing Muhammad as the unerring and eternal emissary of Allah, a Muslim surrenders his liberty to decide for himself.

The Muslims’ surrender of liberty is not merely a matter of personal choice. The Muslims, having abandoned their most precious rights, are out to make all non-Muslims also do so, by hook or crook. It is said that misery loves company. And the type of misery that Islam has visited on the Muslims and the Islamic lands is a rapidly spreading plague that must be resisted by all who cherish their God-given Liberty.

In the land of the free and home of the brave, a prince charming rose up in the person of Barrack Hussein Obama, promising “A Change We Can Believe In.” Waves of the populace sang the song with him, “Yes We Can.” The skill to arouse the public to frenzy does not make one a worthy leader, nor should one automatically assume that his policies will equal prosperity or liberty.

In a climate of insanity, the people of the land called America, having been deceived by a depiction of a fair and caring socialistic idea that would exalt itself as their protector and provider, chose a charismatic, soft speaking “prophet" as their savior, and some people even called him “The Messiah.” He emerged from the fog with a message that had no meaning, yet he was able to hypnotize people by telling them he was sent to save us from ourselves. Never mind his lack of experience, his questionable ethics and integrity, his humongous ego, and his past association with evil doers, for he will save us with hope and change.

Many Americans forgot that anyone who claims special privileges and status for himself, makes outlandish promises and threats, pits one people against another, fits the bill of three-in-one. The most dangerous person of all is anyone who persuades you to give up your liberty in exchange for your security. And we all have heard the cliché “those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary security deserve neither liberty nor security.”

The lesson is clear. Beware of the demagogue who will use your emotions to further his political ambition. Undoubtedly, he serves as the greatest threat to our liberty. He paves the way for the advancement of totalitarianism and our liberty will assuredly be among the very first victims of demagoguery as soon as he assumes power.

Top

You can put lipstick on a pig, but it's still a pig.

Top

The Trinity of Hell

Top

Nigger

Controversial speech will always need vigilant protection. To say that a certain word is good or bad is fine; but to use the powers of the government, industry, media, mobs or education to punish an individual for using that word is wrong. I don't like words like "bitch, cracker, snow white, polygamist, racist, Islamophobe, Jew-lover, etc." but I don't throw a tantrum over them, and it would certainly never, ever, EVER occur to me to demand punishment for their use. Why on earth should we make an exception for Nigger? — Resa LaRu Kirkland

Article

Top